596377
Mohammad Mahmud, Respondent v. Nataliya Makarenko, Appellant
- Whether the trial court abused its discretion (1) when it determined Mohammad Mahmud was entitled to reimbursement for various assets; (2) when it calculated the valuation of those assets and the equalization payments to Nataliya Makarenko; (3) when it designated Mahmud as sole decision-maker for Mahmud and Makarenko daughter’s healthcare and education decisions; (4) when it restricted Makarenko’s ability to travel with their daughter; and (5) when it calculated Mahmud’s income for the purposes of child support payments?