State v. Tommy Gibson
- Gibson challenges his conviction for child molestation in the second degree. He claims that the court improperly admitted his statements made during interrogation—including disclosure of his phone pass code— because the Miranda warning he received was improper and his statements were coerced. Further, Gibson argues that the text messages extracted from his phone should have been suppressed as “fruit of the poisonous tree.” Additionally, Gibson challenges the admission of a recorded phone call between the child victim and her mother. Finally, Gibson contends a community custody condition imposing geographic restrictions is unconstitutionally vague. COA # 867253. King County Superior Court # 20-1-00808-3 SEA.